Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?
Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.
Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.
Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.
The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.
Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.
Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.
A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.
"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.
Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease substantially.
The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.
Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.
"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."
She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."
Some testers encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.
"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.
These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.
Platform modifications in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.
According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.
According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."
A seasoned betting analyst with over a decade of experience in sports wagering and financial risk management.